{"id":3275,"date":"2022-01-21T16:09:12","date_gmt":"2022-01-21T15:09:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/?p=3275"},"modified":"2025-03-05T13:38:17","modified_gmt":"2025-03-05T12:38:17","slug":"is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/","title":{"rendered":"Is there a future for No-Show Clauses in Austria?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Over the last years, consumer protection agencies throughout the European Union have made continued efforts to prevent the use of so called No-Show Clauses, which are commonly used by airlines in their general conditions of carriage. In Austria, this led to several court proceedings in which rulings effectively restricting the use of No-Show Clauses were issued. This, in turn, prompted many airlines to adapt their clauses in order to comply with the court practice. This article seeks to give a brief overview of the topic and the future of No-Show Clauses in Austria against the backdrop of the most recent ruling of the Austrian Supreme Court in case 4 Ob 63\/21z<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n

What is a No-Show Clause?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Airlines use complex pricing systems to allocate specific ticket fares to individual passengers. The ticket fare a passenger is charged depends, inter alia, on the specific itinerary he or she chooses. This is because, on the one hand, passengers are willing to pay higher fares for direct flights; on the other hand, fares are generally dependent on the respective place of departure. As a result, the ticket fare for a flight booked e.g. from Warsaw to New York with a stopover in Vienna will probably be offered for a lower fare than a direct flight from Vienna to New York. Another example would be roundtrips (e.g. with the flight legs Vienna – New York – Vienna), which are often offered for a lower price than one-way tickets.<\/p>\n

However, airlines experienced some passengers using the pricing system to their advantage by e.g. booking a flight from Warsaw to New York with a stopover in Vienna instead of a (more expensive) direct flight from Vienna to New York despite their residence in Vienna and their intention to only be transported from Vienna to New York. Other passengers book a roundtrip and intentionally \u201cmiss\u201d the second flight leg. Some travel agencies even specialize in getting the cheapest ticket fares possible for their customers by circumventing the pricing system in this way.<\/p>\n

As a reaction, airlines implemented so called No-Show Clauses in their general conditions of carriage stipulating that passengers will be denied boarding or have to pay an adapted fare when they do not use all flight legs (i.e., in our examples: when the passenger does not board the flight from Warsaw to Vienna or misses his or her second flight leg from New York to Vienna).<\/p>\n

How are No-Show Clauses challenged by consumer protection agencies?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Since No-Show Clauses are usually implemented in an airline\u00b4s general conditions of carriage, several organizations have the right to challenge them according to Austrian consumer protection provisions. Especially the \u201cVerein f\u00fcr Konsumenteninformation, VKI<\/em>\u201d and the \u201cBundesarbeitskammer<\/em>\u201d are quite active in this regard.<\/p>\n

These two organizations are regularly screening general terms and conditions used by several companies including general conditions of carriage used by airlines operating flights to or from Austria for clauses which they deem to be unlawful, especially by arguing that such clauses are surprising and disadvantageous for consumers or grossly disadvantageous. If a clause is deemed to be unlawful, the airline usually receives a letter from the consumer protection body or its lawyer demanding that the airline in question immediately refrains from using the \u201cunlawful\u201d clause, together with a cease and desist declaration secured by a contractual penalty.<\/p>\n

One aspect that is often criticized by our clients is that normally the consumer protection agencies are neither willing to discuss the lawfulness of the respective clause nor to work together to find a solution that takes into account the positions of both the consumer and the airline. They rather only give airlines the options to either sign the cease and desist declaration within (usually) 14 days or be confronted with court proceedings.<\/p>\n

How are No-Show Clauses viewed by Austrian courts?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Austrian courts regard No-Show Clauses to be void especially when they are deemed to be either surprising and disadvantageous for the consumer or grossly disadvantageous. While the \u201csurprising\u201d character of a No-Show Clause may be avoided by implementing certain measures in the booking process to ensure that passengers are duly informed, it is rather challenging for airlines to formulate No-Show Clauses that are not regarded as grossly disadvantageous but are still effective.<\/p>\n

The Austrian Supreme Court first had to deal with No-Show Clauses in 2012 (4 Ob 164\/12i<\/a><\/strong>, a case in which our partner, Martina Flitsch<\/a><\/strong>, was directly involved). While the Supreme Court explicitly acknowledged the airline\u00b4s legitimate interest to implement and protect its pricing system, it regarded the No-Show Clause the airline used to be too extensive and, therefore, grossly disadvantageous. This view was adopted and further developed in several other Supreme Court rulings with the latest one being 4 Ob 63\/21z<\/a><\/strong> from 2021.<\/p>\n

As a reaction, several airlines operating flights to and from Austria adapted their conditions of carriage in order to comply with the criteria set forth by Austrian court practice. Therefore, nowadays the consequence of not using all flight legs is usually a recalculation of the ticket fare or a lump sum that must be paid. Additionally, many No-Show Clauses now explicitly state that they do not apply in cases of force majeure, illness or, in general, when the reasons for the passenger not using all flight legs are not attributable to him or her.<\/p>\n

What does the future hold for No-Show Clauses in Austria?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

The latest decision of the Austrian Supreme Court (4 Ob 63\/21z<\/a><\/strong>) dealt with a No-Show Clause that has obviously been designed to comply with the Austrian court practice. However, despite careful drafting, the clause was finally regarded as grossly disadvantageous to the consumer and, therefore, void. The Supreme Court emphasized the necessity to differentiate between passengers that are deliberately circumventing the pricing system and passengers that are not using all flight legs for any other reason.<\/p>\n

In practice, it is foreseeable that it will be particularly challenging for airlines to successfully determine on a case by case basis if a passenger is circumventing the pricing system, especially when this decision must be made very quickly before boarding is denied. Especially with regard to the Regulation (EU) 261\/2004 and the organizations specialized in representing passengers in cases of denied boarding, the risk of lawsuits and court proceedings, in which airlines have to prove that the denied boarding has been justified, is rather high.<\/p>\n

Despite the many challenges airlines face when it comes to No-Show Clauses in Austria, it is, in our opinion, rather unlikely that airlines will refrain from using them. As explained, No-Show Clauses are an essential tool to ensure the functioning of an airline\u00b4s pricing system, which is a vital part of an airline\u00b4s business model.<\/p>\n

Therefore, airlines must remain vigilant and keep an eye on ongoing developments such as new court decisions in order to avoid being confronted by consumer protection agencies or finding themselves in court proceedings which, while causing substantial workload and legal fees, have limited chances of success. In such cases, it is certainly not a mistake \u00a0to engage a reliable legal advisor who is experienced in dealing with consumer protection agencies and handling passenger claims.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Over the last years, consumer protection agencies throughout the European Union have made continued efforts to prevent the use of so…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":3277,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[238],"tags":[766,767,768,769,331,701,723,700,724,770,773,774,332,775,782,783,249,749,145,259,146,260],"yoast_head":"\nIs there a future for No-Show Clauses in Austria? - Weisenheimer<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"This article seeks to give a brief overview of the topic and the future of No-Show Clauses in Austria considering recent court practice.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Is there a future for No-Show Clauses in Austria? - Weisenheimer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This article seeks to give a brief overview of the topic and the future of No-Show Clauses in Austria considering recent court practice.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Weisenheimer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-01-21T15:09:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-03-05T12:38:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Image-Article-No-Show-Clauses.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"627\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Weisenheimer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/\",\"name\":\"Weisenheimer\",\"description\":\"Legal\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Image-Article-No-Show-Clauses.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Image-Article-No-Show-Clauses.png\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":627,\"caption\":\"No-Show Clauses in Austria\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/\",\"name\":\"Is there a future for No-Show Clauses in Austria? - Weisenheimer\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-01-21T15:09:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-03-05T12:38:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/#\/schema\/person\/eea97adeb8f022ffe8b72d54286d1c36\"},\"description\":\"This article seeks to give a brief overview of the topic and the future of No-Show Clauses in Austria considering recent court practice.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Startseite\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Is there a future for No-Show Clauses in Austria?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/#\/schema\/person\/eea97adeb8f022ffe8b72d54286d1c36\",\"name\":\"Weisenheimer\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Is there a future for No-Show Clauses in Austria? - Weisenheimer","description":"This article seeks to give a brief overview of the topic and the future of No-Show Clauses in Austria considering recent court practice.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Is there a future for No-Show Clauses in Austria? - Weisenheimer","og_description":"This article seeks to give a brief overview of the topic and the future of No-Show Clauses in Austria considering recent court practice.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/","og_site_name":"Weisenheimer","article_published_time":"2022-01-21T15:09:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-03-05T12:38:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":627,"url":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Image-Article-No-Show-Clauses.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Weisenheimer","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/","name":"Weisenheimer","description":"Legal","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Image-Article-No-Show-Clauses.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Image-Article-No-Show-Clauses.png","width":1200,"height":627,"caption":"No-Show Clauses in Austria"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/","name":"Is there a future for No-Show Clauses in Austria? - Weisenheimer","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2022-01-21T15:09:12+00:00","dateModified":"2025-03-05T12:38:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/#\/schema\/person\/eea97adeb8f022ffe8b72d54286d1c36"},"description":"This article seeks to give a brief overview of the topic and the future of No-Show Clauses in Austria considering recent court practice.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/is-there-a-future-for-no-show-clauses-in-austria\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Startseite","item":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Is there a future for No-Show Clauses in Austria?"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/#\/schema\/person\/eea97adeb8f022ffe8b72d54286d1c36","name":"Weisenheimer"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3275"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3275"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3275\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6129,"href":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3275\/revisions\/6129"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3277"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3275"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3275"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3275"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}