{"id":3697,"date":"2022-10-27T09:38:12","date_gmt":"2022-10-27T07:38:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/?p=3697"},"modified":"2023-05-13T12:02:29","modified_gmt":"2023-05-13T10:02:29","slug":"consequences-of-a-travel-agencys-actions-for-air-carriers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.weisenheimer.law\/en\/consequences-of-a-travel-agencys-actions-for-air-carriers\/","title":{"rendered":"Consequences of a travel agency\u00b4s actions for air carriers"},"content":{"rendered":"
In two recent decisions, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) dealt with the consequences of a travel agency\u00b4s actions for air carriers in context with Regulation 261\/2004.<\/p>\n
In case C-307\/21<\/strong><\/a>, the passengers booked flights from D\u00fcsseldorf to Tangier via the travel agent Kiwi.com. The air carrier was provided with an e-mail address, which was most likely automatically generated by Kiwi.com and to which the passengers had no access. In the following, the air carrier sent an e-mail to this e-mail address in order to inform the passengers about the cancellation of their flight. Since this e-mail has been sent 14 days prior to the date of the scheduled flight, it would have complied with Article 5 (1) (c) (i) of Regulation 261\/2004, resulting in the passengers not being entitled to receive a compensation within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation 261\/2004. However, Kiwi.com did not forward this e-mail to the passengers.<\/p>\n The CJEU decided on 27 September 2022 that the air carrier is obliged to pay a compensation to the passengers if the travel agency didn\u00b4t forward the air carrier\u00b4s e-mail in due time even if the air carrier was not aware of the fact that the e-mail address it has been provided with could only be used to contact the travel agency and not the passengers directly.<\/p>\n